Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163308 (ALL)

TRILOKI VERMA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A482/7581/2025 · 2025-09-15

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7581 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. Instant application has been filed with prayer to set aside the order dated 13.12.2024 of Bailable Warrants@Rs.10000 and subsequent order passed by the Learned Civil Judge(SD)-I/Court of A.C.J.M, Sultanpur in Crl. Case No. 391 of 2024 arising out of case crime no. 313 of 2023 u/s 504, 506, 323 and 427 of IPC P.S. Jaisinghpur District- Sultanpur pending before the court of Learned Civil Judge(SD)-I/Court of A.C.J.M., Sultanpur and further more to set aside the further proceedings of Crl. Case No. 391 of 2024. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyam Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Triloki Verma And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 15, 2025 Mayank A482 No. 7581 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench