HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10387 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard Dr. Amrendra Nath Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 and 2, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3, and Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 2. At the very outset, Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4, on the basis of instructions given by the District Basic Education Officer, Shravasti, states that the order impugned dated 17.06.2025, a copy of which is annexure-1 to the petition, whereby the appointment of the petitioner has been cancelled from the date of initial appointment itself, may be set aside with liberty to the respondents to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 3. Considering the aforesaid, the order impugned dated 17.06.2025, a copy of which is annexure-1 to the petition, is set aside. 4. Consequences to follow. 5. However, it would be open for the respondents to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amrendra Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kumar Ayush, Ran Vijay Singh (Abdul Moin,J.) Bhupendra Babu .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. And 3others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench