ARVIND KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/8862/2025 · 2025-09-11
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163299 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8862 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J.
HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Land Management Committee concerned. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties to not dissposses to the petitioner from his possession, and registered of his occupant 2000sqft land at his name, on the khatauni, which situated in bearing Gata No.111 recorded as Banjar land in revenue record, which situated Village kolva, Tehsil and Pargana Rudauli, District Ayodhya. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite restrain illegally dispossessing to the petitioner from possessive land, which situated in bearing Gata No.111 recorded as Banjar land in revenue record, which situated Village kolva, Tehsil and Pargana Rudauli, District Ayodhya, without following the provision provided under law, in the interest of justice."
3. It is that case of the petitioner that petitioner's father had been given a housing patta in Village Kolva, Pargana and Tehsil Rudauli, District Ayodhya and he has constructed a small house on such a land. Adjacent to the house of the petitioner, Gata No.111, area 0.5560 hectare, which is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vimlesh Kumar, Ved Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Arvind Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
recorded as Banjar land on which, private respondent-Vijay Kumar, has constructed his house. The petitioner wants respondent no.5 to be evicted. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has placed before this Court the instructions sent by the Tehsildar, Rudauli, District Ayodhya, wherein it has been stated that the Revenue Inspector and Lekhpal had conducted an enquiry and in their report, it has been stated that Gata no.111, area 0.556 hectare is recorded as Banjar land and out of such land, 0.010 hectare land has been used by the petitioner for raising his house. He has used the remaining land for tethering his cattle. The petitioner wishes his possession to be regularised. He is claiming his rights on the basis of such possession over Banjar land recorded in the name of Gaon Sabha.
The said instructions are kept on record. 5. We do not find any good ground to issue a mandamus as prayed for. 6. The writ petition is dismissed. September 11, 2025 Sachin WRIC No. 8862 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench