HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10503 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the present writ petition is being disposed of finally. Under challenge is the punishment order dated 08.12.2023, a copy of which is Annexures-1 whereby the petitioner has been imposed with two penalties after the departmental proceedings as well as appellate order dated 02.09.2024, a copy of which is Annexure 2 to the petition, whereby the appeal filed against the punishment order has been rejected. Reliance has been placed on a Full Bench judgment of this Court in Special Appeal No.435 of 2008 in re: Pancham Ram Yadav vs. The U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd. and another, decided on 02.09.2019 to contend that the Full Bench has held that only one punishment can be imposed as specifically indicated in Regulation 84 of the U.P. Co-Operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975. Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents, does not dispute the aforesaid proposition of law as laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Pancham Ram Yadav (supra). Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Piyush Asthana Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vinod Kumar Singh Kamal Bansal .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Sahkari Gram Vikas Bank Ltd. Thru. Managing Director Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) impugned orders dated 08.12.2023 and 02.09.2024, copies of which are Annexure-1 & 2 to the writ petition, are set-aside. Consequences to follow. However, it would be open for the respondents to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. September 10, 2025 prateek WRIA No. 10503 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench