Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163293 (ALL)

Sanjay Srivastava v. Smt. Radha Upadhyay and another

SCCRD/8/2022 · 2025-08-11

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46905 Court No. - 6 Case :- S.C.C. REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 8 of 2022 Revisionist :- Sanjay Srivastava Opposite Party :- Smt. Radha Upadhyay And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ankit Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prashant Singh Gaur Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. (Order on I.A. No. 01 of 2022) 1. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the revision. 2. Cause shown is sufficient. 3. Delay is condoned. 4. The application is allowed. (Order on Revision) 1. None appears on behalf of the revisionist to press the revision even in the revised call. 2. The report send by the trial court indicates that the decree of ejectment has already been executed and the decree of arrears of rent is yet to be executed. 3. Considering the said report that the decree of ejectment has already been executed, no interference is called for. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed. Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Praveen Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench