MOHIT KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/8590/2025 · 2025-09-11
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163284 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163284 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8590 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Nagarjun Pandey, learned State Counsel and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 122/2025, under Sections 137(2), 87 BNS, Police Station Tarun, District Ayodhya. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 27.06.2025 stating that the applicant had enticed away the informant's daughter aged 15 years on 14.06.2025. 4. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 BNSS, she stated that she is aged 17 years, she knows the applicant for the past two years, parents of the applicant had proposed to get her married to the applicant but her parents did not agree to it and, therefore, she had gone to Bharatkund where she has married the applicant. 5. The victim declined to undergo the medico legal examination. 6. In the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS also, the victim did not level any allegation against the applicant. 7. In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young boy aged 19 years having no criminal history and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 8. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail and he has submitted that the allegations levelled in the FIR have been established during investigation and a charge sheet has been submitted on 29.08.2025. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the consistent statements of the victim wherein she has not levelled any Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Tiwari, Amit Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohit Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
allegation against the applicant; that the applicant is a young boy aged 19 years having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 03.07.2025 whereas the investigation already stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11.
Let the applicant-Mohit Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: - (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. September 11, 2025 Pradeep/- BAIL No. 8590 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench