Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163274 (ALL)

PRAMUKH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/8583/2025 · 2025-09-11

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8583 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Kailash Nath Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Manish Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.103 of 2025 under Sections 352, 326(G), 131, 351(2) of B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Tarabganj, District- Gonda. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 17.04.2025 against three persons, including the applicant, stating that all the accused persons had set the hatched roof of the informant's hut ablaze at about 09:00 PM on 16.04.2025. When the complainant complained about it, all the accused persons chased her and her son by threatening to beat them up with sticks. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man aged 22 years and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to village politics. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application and on the basis of written instructions, he has submitted that allegations have been established during investigation and a charge-sheet has been submitted on 23.05.2025. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the FIR or the statements did not disclose any reason/motive for commission of the offence; that the applicant is a young man aged 22 years having no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 20.04.2025 whereas the investigation stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kailash Nath Mishra, Rahul Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pramukh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Pramukh Yadav be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 11, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8583 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench