ARVIND KUMAR AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5366/2025 · 2025-09-09
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163268 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163268 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5366 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Vakalatnama has been filed by Sri Yatindra Pathak, Advocate on behalf of respondent No. 3 which is taken on record.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction for expeditious disposal of Case No. 38 of 2012-13 (Computerized Case no. T201310462101) (Dhaniram Vs. State of U.P. and others) filed U/S 122-B (4-F) of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case, respondent No.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2- Sub-Divisional Officer Tehsil - Sarojini Nagar, District - Lucknow is directed to consider and decide Case No. 38 of 2012-13 (Computerized Case no. T201310462101) (Dhaniram Vs. State of U.P. and others) filed U/S 122-B (4-F) of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Mishra, Antriksh Verma, Rahul Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Namit Sharma Arvind Kumar And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5366 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench