HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8471 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Ram Kumar Singh,Advocate on behalf of the respondent no.4 is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Hari Om Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA and learned counsel for the respondent no.4. 3. This petition has been filed challenging the impugned F.I.R. No.195/2025 under Sections 87, 137(2) of B.N.S., Police Station Sadarpur, District Sitapur. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has wrongly and falsely been implicated in the impugned F.I.R., whereas he has no concern with the alleged offence. He further submits that the victim had come to the petitioner's house after leaving her home. She had left the home on account of illicit relation of the complainant(mother of the victim) with the Gram Pradhan of the village in question. She gave an application before the S.H.O., P.S. Sadarpur, District Sitapur on 24.08.2025. Thereafter, she went to the Women Protection Home, Lucknow, where she has taken shelter to save herself and presently she is residing there. 5. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions, submits that the victim is not traceable. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Singh, Prabodh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ashok Kumar (In Fir Ashok) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Learned counsel for the respondent no.4 submits that the victim is not traceable and the respondent no.4 had enquired about the victim in the Women Protection Home,Sitapur as well as Women Protection Home, Lucknow and victim is not in the Women Protection Home. Thus, contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is mis-conceived and not tenable. 7. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of F.I.R., prima facie, the commissioning of offence cannot be ruled out and the victim is also not traceable. 8. In view of above, the petition is mis-conceived. It is, accordingly, dismissed. September 19, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 8471 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench