Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163244 (ALL)

AKHILESH KUMAR DIXIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/945/2025 · 2025-09-11

Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 945 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Shri Ashutosh Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Ram Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the Nagar Panchayat. 2. Let the petitioner approach the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat - Ugu, District - Unnao, raising his grievance regarding alleged encroachment on the relevant gata's which according to him are reserved for cattle. 3. The said officer shall get the facts inquired and if he finds that there is encroachment on the land which is under the control of Nagar Panchayat and vests in it, then he shall do the needful as per law, but with promptness. 4. If nothing happens within a period of two months, the petitioner can approach this Court again. 5. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. September 11, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ram Kumar Singh (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Akhilesh Kumar Dixit .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench