HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5338 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no.2 to 13 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya to decide the restoration case No.255 of 2024 "Smt. Anar Kali @ Ram Pati vs. Ram Badal & others" pending in Case No.3/8/10/13/73/73/746 "Anirudh Prasad Panday vs. Ram Charan & others" U/S 176 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act which is pending since 01.10.2024, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid restoration application in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Sadar, District Ayodhya is directed to decide the restoration case No.255 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Nayak, Pavan Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Smt. Anar Kali @ Ram Pati .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tahsil Sadar, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) of 2024 "Smt. Anar Kali @ Ram Pati vs. Ram Badal & others" pending in Case No.3/8/10/13/73/73/746 "Anirudh Prasad Panday vs. Ram Charan & others" U/S 176 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 8, 2025 KR A227 No. 5338 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench