HARISHANKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF/ PRIN. SECY., REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/5355/2025 · 2025-09-09
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163227 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163227 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5355 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction for expeditious disposal of restoration/recall application dated 08.04.2025 in Case No. 4751/2024 bearing Computerized Case No. T202408300504751 (neelam Dwivedi Vs. Hari Sankar) U/S 34 of U.P.R.C. 2006.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case, State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2- Naib Tehsildar, Colongalganj, District Gonda is directed to consider and decide restoration/recall application dated 08.04.2025 in Case No. 4751/2024 bearing Computerized Case No. T202408300504751 (neelam Dwivedi Vs. Hari Sankar) U/S 34 of U.P.R.C. 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aviral Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Harishankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/ Prin. Secy., Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5355 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench