Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163220 (ALL)

SMT. NAMRATA TIWARY @ NAMRATA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AFFAIRS U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

A483/744/2025 · 2025-09-09

Shree Prakash Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 744 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application under section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to direct the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar to decide Criminal Case No.1724/2022 (State Vs. Ratnakar Upadhyay and others), arising out of Case Crime No.0156/2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC read with Section 3/4 D.P. Act lodged at Police Station Ahirauli, District Ambedkar Nagar within the stipulated period of time. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that marriage of the applicant was solemnized with opposite party no. 2 on 11.05.2018; opposite party nos. 2, 3 and 4, who are husband and in-laws of the applicant, thrown the applicant out of their home and being annoyed from their aforesaid act the applicant lodged FIR No.0156/2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC read with Section 3/4 D.P. Act lodged at Police Station Ahirauli, District Ambedkar against them on 27.06.2021; after investigation, the investigating officer had filed charge-sheet on 12.09.2021; learned trial court took cognizance of the offence and fixed several dates for appearance of the opposite party nos. 2, 3 and 4 and ultimately on 28.08.2024 bailable warrants of arrest were issued against them for Rs.10,000/-; and the matter is pending before the court concerned since 2022 and the applicant, being a lady, is running from pillar to post. 4. After arguing at length, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Misra, Mahesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Namrata Tiwary @ Namrata .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Affairs U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) may be pleased to direct the trial court to decide the matter within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. 5. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has no objection. 6. Considering aforesaid innocuous prayer, the earned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar is directed to decide Criminal Case No.1724/2022 (State Vs. Ratnakar Upadhyay and others), with expedition, in accordance with law, considering the instructions and guidelines issued by this Court time to time. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the instant application stands disposed of. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) September 9, 2025 MVS/- A483 No. 744 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench