HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10294 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 21.07.2025 whereby petitioner has been transferred from district Ballia to Banda. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that despite an option having been provided by petitioner in terms of Clause-4 (iv) of the government order dated 06.05.2025, the same has not been considered by the opposite parties despite the fact that petitioner was employed at aspirational block an option was required to be considered. 4.Since petitioner's grievance would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. Food Commissioner U.P., Food and Civil Supplies Department, U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of. September 8, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, Amar Prasad Singh, Ayush Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Atrimuni Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supplies Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench