Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16320 (CHH)

DINESH NAIK v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WPS/3131/2021 · 2025-03-22

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:13785 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3131 of 2021 1 - Dinesh Naik S/o Late Shri Parmanand Naik Aged About 26 Years Mother Smt. Savita Naik, Aged About 26 Years R/o Koltapara Bhikharimal, Post Boeerdadar, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh Pin 496001 2 - Smt. Savita Naik W/o Late Shri Parmanand Naik Aged About 55 Years R/o Koltapara Bhikharimal, Post Boeerdadar, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh Pin 496001 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Textiles Department, Udhayog Bhavan New Delhi Pin 110011 2 - Central Silk Board C. S. B. Complex, Btm Layout, Madivala, Houser Road, Banglore Karnataka Pin 560068 3 - Basic Seed Multiplication And Training Center Boirdadar Raigarh Workinga Under The Central Silk Board, Through The Scientist-D Basic Seed Multiplication And Training Center Boirdadar Raigarh Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh Pin 496004 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vijay K. Deshmukh, Advocate. For UOI : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. S.G. with Ms. Jyoti Singh, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 22.03.2025 1. At the very outset, learned Dy.S.G. for respondent/UOI would submit that the permissible dues i.e. Rs. 6,22,323/- towards gratuity & Rs. 5000/- towards ex-gratia has already been paid to the petitioners on 30.03.2020 and as per the policy, the petitioners cannot claim for grant of compassionate appointment. To substantiate this submission, he has submitted copy of vouchers indicating that the amount has already been paid to the petitioners. ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.03.22 16:46:09 +0530 2 2. Considering the aforesaid submission made by learned Dy.S.G. that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court at this stage. 3. Accordingly, this Petition stands disposed of. 4. Voucher dated 30.03.2020 and other documents submitted by learned Dy.S.G. is taken on record. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun