Kh Keinahanbi Devi and 2 others v. Commissioner (Revenue) and 2 others
MC(WP(C))/537/2025 · 2025-08-27
A Guneshwar Sharma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1632 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1632 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Item No. 5-6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
MC(WP(C) No. 518 of 2025 with WP(C) No. 537 of 2025
Thounaojam Ibechaobi Devi Alias Thounaojam Chaobi Devi
…..Applicant/s
- Versus –
Commissioner (Revenue) & 2 Ors.
.... Respondent/s
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Order
28.08.2025 [1]
Mr. Th. Mahira, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in the demarcation proceeding, the encroached area has already been marked by the State authority and the petitioner is agreeable with the finding of the demarcation proceeding and the matter may be closed. [2]
Mr. H. Debendra, learned Dy. A.G., has no objection. [3]
Recording the submissions made at the bar, writ petition is disposed of. Misc. application is closed. [4]
Interim order is merged with the final order. [5]
Any eviction or demolition to be done after proper verification from the encroached area as per the demarcation proceeding.
JUDGE
Kh. Joshua Maring KH. JOSHUA MARING Digitally signed by KH. JOSHUA MARING Date: 2025.08.29 09:30:56 +05'30'