Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163199 (ALL)

NIRMALA DEVI v. TAHSILDAR, TAHSIL KUNDA, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS

A227/5444/2025 · 2025-09-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5444 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh to decide the Case No.00417 of 2019 (Computerized Case No.T201902570100417) "Shankar vs. Ram Lakahan" under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Tehsildar, Tehsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide the Case No.00417 of 2019 (Computerized Case No.T201902570100417) "Shankar vs. Ram Lakahan" under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006,, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Govind Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Nirmala Devi .....Petitioner(s) Tahsildar, Tahsil Kunda, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 KR A227 No. 5444 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench