HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8836 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the UPSRTC, Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the Land Management Committee and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to not to create pakka-boundary wall on the boundary line of plot No. 3244 belongs to Gram Sabha and the plot No. 3242 belongs to petitioner (live shops & house) otherwise it would automatically block the egress/ingress of plot no. 3242 of petitioner and Plot No. 3240 Khalihan, public toilet and talab i.e. the public utility land in the interest of justice. (representation contents as annexure No 1). (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opposite party No. 1 to take necessary initiatives to obtaining the joint report of Gram-Sabha, Revenue Department and Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation on the plot No. 3240 for public amenities/utilities for which the petitioner has already made available the path through his plot 3242 now useless and abandoned where anyone can easily access from road side." 3. Having gone through the pleadings on record, it appears that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Dubey, Roopani Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Shukla Sushmit Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate, Hardoi And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner is aggrieved by construction of boundary wall to enclose the land that has been allocated for a bus stop for U.P.S.R.T.C. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the land of the petitioner is right behind the land allocated for bus stop and his plot will become land-locked. 5. It has also been submitted that he has made repeated representations, but no appropriate order has been passed thereon. 6. Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, Advocate has brought to the notice of this Court page 24 of the paper book which is revenue map of the village concerned. The bus stop has been proposed adjacent to the road and the bus stop has been proposed by the Gram Sabha looking into the welfare of the general public on land that belongs to the Gram Sabha. The petitioner wants easementary rights through the bus stop to his plot of land. 7. The petitioner may move the appropriate application before the Civil Court for the same. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 8836 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench