VINOD KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/7498/2024 · 2025-04-03
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163192 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163192 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18633-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7498 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ravindra Kumar,Ved Prakash,Vivek Tiwari Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and Sri Ved Prakash, learned counsel for opposite party no.4.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated 16.03.2024 registered as F.I.R. No.0112 of 2024, under Sections 376, 504, 506 and 328 IPC, Police Station Gazipur, District Lucknow.
3. On agreement of the parties, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre of this Court on 03.10.2024 and the Mediation and Conciliation Center, High Court, Lucknow has submitted its report dated 05.11.2024 along with the settlement entered into between the parties, whereby the parties have settled their dispute amicably.
4. According to the terms of the compromise, parties have settled their dispute amicably. They further agreed to withdraw the cases filed against each other including F.I.R. No.0112 of 2024, under Sections 376, 504, 506 and 328 IPC, Police Station Gazipur, District Lucknow.
5. Learned counsel for the parties state that under the said agreement, both the parties got married on 09.05.2024 in Arya Samaj Mandir, Aliganj, Lucknow in presence of parents and
relatives and are living as wife and husband.
6. Considering the terms of settlement, we, accordingly, allow the writ petition and quash the FIR. All proceedings/investigation which may have been held consequent thereto are also quashed. However, it is open for the informant to move an application for recall of this order in case there is any violation of the terms of the agreement.
7. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this
order to the Court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly.
8. Learned AGA shall communicate this order to the investigating officer concerned. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Order Date :- 3.4.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench