Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16318 (CHH)

RAMESH SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1721/2025 · 2025-04-11

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17028 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1721 of 2025 1 - Ramesh Sharma S/o Late Goverdhan Sharma Aged About 59 Years R/o Shrikunj Colony, Near Shalini Convent School, Boirdada, Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Vikas Bhawan, Civil Lines Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Vikas Bhawan, Ground Floor Sector 19 North Block, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Superintending Engineer Chhattisgarh Rural Development Agency Project Unit/circle 01, Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh Rural Development Agency Project Unit/circle 01, Raigarh (C.G.) 7 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.21 11:18:06 +0530 2 For State/Respondent(s) : Mr. R. K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 11/04/2025 1. Heard Mr. Bharat Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. R. K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General for the State/respondent/s. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset fairly submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission is granted with the liberty as prayed for. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn and Registry is directed that the documents attached as Annexure P/7 i.e. the original photographs be returned by taking photocopy of the same on record. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi