Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163179 (ALL)

ASHISH KUMAR YADAV v. CIVIL JUDGE (S.D. ) LKO.

A227/5354/2025 · 2025-09-09

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5354 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 in Regular Suit no.2591 of 2024 pending before the respondent No.1. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the application filed under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC in Regular Suit no.2591 of 2024 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 9, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harshit Singh, Garima Singh, Kamal Kant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Ashish Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge (S.D. ) Lko. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench