Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16317 (AP)

D SRINIVASULU REDDY v. GOPALA KRISHNA DWIDEDI

CC/2505/2024 · 2025-09-01

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010214752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2505/2024 Between: 1. D SRINIVASULU REDDY, S/O.LAKSHMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 23RDWARD, MUNNAMVARIPALEM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. N. CHANDRA REDDY, S/ O. VEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 23RD WARD, MUNNAMVARIPALEM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. K.BALAJI, , S/O. VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 25TH WARD, VIJAYALAKSHMIPURAM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. M.BRAHMA REDDY, S/O.BULLIVEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 23 WARD, MUNNAMVARIPALEM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SYED RAHIM BASHA, S/O.GHOUSEBASHA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 23RD WARD, MUNNAMVARIPALEM, NOW AT ISLAMPET, 30TH WARD, BAPTLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. M.ROSI REDDY, S/O.BULLIVEERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 23RD WARD, MUNNAMVARIPALEM, BAPATLA, 2 GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. .K.ROOTAMMA @ VENKAYAMMA, W/O.POLI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 57YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 25TH WARD, VIJAYALAKSHMIPURAM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. A.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O. VENKATESWARLU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, DARIVADHAKOTHAPALEM, WEST BAPATLA, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. V.CHENCHULAKSHMI, W/O.POLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 22ND WARD, SANJAYGANDHI COLONY, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 10. K.SHYAM,, S/O.SRIRAMULU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 29TH WARD, JAGANNADHAPURAM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 11. P.NAGAMANI,, W/O. YESUDASU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 21ST WARD, PAPINENIVARIVEEDHI, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 12. D.SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.ANJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 31ST WARD, VIJAYALAKSHMIPURAM. BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 13. K.KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. VENKATESWARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, DARIVADHAKOTHAPALEM, WEST BAPATLA, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 14. PALAPARTHISRINIVASA RAO, S/O.NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYE'E IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 17TH WARD, SRUNGARAPURAM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 15. G. CHITEMMA, W/O.KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 22ND WARD, SANJAY GANDHI COLONY, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 16. G.USHA RANI, W/O.SATYNARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, 3 OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 15TH WARD, SRUNGARAPURAM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 17. N.KRISHNA, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 6TH WARD, RELLI COLONY, RAILPET, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 18. G.SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 26TH WARD, VIJAYALAKSHMIPURAM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 19. N.SAMBASIUVA RAO, S/O.PEDAAPPA RAO, AGAD ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCO. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 11TH WARD, KARUMURIHANUMANTHA RAO COLONY, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 20. B.MURALI KRISHNA, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE. BAPATLA, 3RD WARD, RAILPET, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 21. N.SIVALAKSHMI, W/O.POLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE IN AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, 3RD WARD, RELLI COLONY, RAILPET, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GOPALA KRISHNA DWIDEDI, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. RABATH, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. DR K GURUVA REDDY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR. ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, LAM, TADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 4. DR V SRINIVASA RAO, ASSOCIATIVE DEEN, AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, BAPATLA, REP. BY ITS ASSOCIATE DEAN, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4 5. G RAMACHANDRA RAO, REGISTRAR, ACHARYA N.G.RANGA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, LAM,TADIKONDA MANDAL,GUNTUR DISTRICT 6. DR PRASUNA RANI, ASSOCIATIVE DEAN,AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE,BAPATLA, BAPATLA ,BAPATLA DISTRICT. RR 5 AND 6 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 31.07.24 VIDE IA NO-1 OF 2024 IN CC NO-2505 OF 2024. 7. B RAJASEKHAR I A S, REP BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY AGRICULTURAL AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH A P SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 8. PIYUSH KUMAR I A S, REP BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH A P SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT RR 7 AND 8 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 05 03 2025 VIDE I A NO 4 OF 2025 IN CC NO 2505 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M PITCHAIAH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y BALAJI 2. S PRANATHI The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri M. Pitchaiah, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioners and Ms. Maitraie, learned Counsel representing Ms. S. Pranathi, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.3, 4, 5 & 6. 2. On the last occasion, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents had furnished a statement indicating the deposit of amounts into the respective accounts of the Petitioners herein. Having received the 5 statement, Sri M. Pitchaiah, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, sought time to obtain Instructions as regards the receipt of the amounts. He would, on Instructions, submit that the amounts have been received into the respective accounts but it is not clear whether the Employee Provident Fund contributions have been made by the Employer. 3. This Court, at the outset, is of the opinion that the scope of enquiry in the present Contempt Case is limited only to the extent of whether the due amounts have been paid or not. 4. The Petitioners are at liberty to correspond with the Employer to verify whether the Employee Provident Fund contributions have been paid or not, which shall be a separate cause of action. 5. Since the amounts have been paid in the present Contempt Case, no further consideration of this Contempt Case is necessary. 6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 7. Liberty is granted to the Contempt Petitioners to approach this Court in the event of any non-compliance of the Order passed by this Court dated 20.11.2023 in W.P.No.3969 of 2020. 8. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 02.09.2025 DSV 6 216 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2505/2024 02.09.2025 DSV 7 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2505/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 18. 02.09.2025 GRKP, J Contempt Case is closed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV