Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163169 (ALL)

RINKU SINGH @ AJAY PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P.

A227/5424/2025 · 2025-09-10

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5424 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that because of certain defects crept in the petition, he does not want to press the instant petition and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajjoo Singh, Anand Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Rinku Singh @ Ajay Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench