Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163153 (ALL)

SMT. MEENU PATHAK AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. LANGUAGE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/10335/2025 · 2025-09-09

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10335 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Sahrash Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1. 2. No notice is being issued to respondent No.2 and 3 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners are all employees of the Uttar Pradesh Punjabi Academy. 4. The Academy, vide its letter dated 12.07.2021, a copy of which is annexure-6 to the petition, has made a recommendation for grant of the New Pension Scheme and other benefits, yet the said recommendation is still pending for consideration before the respondent No.1. 5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1 to take a decision in the matter in terms of the letter dated 12.07.2021 sent by the Academy. 6. Let the decision be taken in accordance with law under the relevant Rules within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 9, 2025 Pachhere/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishwas Shukla, Ram Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Abdul Moin,J.) Smt. Meenu Pathak And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Language Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench