PANKAJ KUMAR TRIVEDI @ PANKAJ TRIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. / PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/10528/2025 · 2025-09-10
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163150 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163150 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10528 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- (i) issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents no.2 to 4 to make payment of interest on delayed payment of post retiral dues from dues from due dates to the date of actual payment i.e. on various dates from 01.09.2017 till 24.01.2025 due to deceased father of petitioner in Class III category post of Collection Amin by maintaining his account in Class III category. (ii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to make payment of increments which have not been given to the petitioner's father during service period without any fault of petitioner's deceased father Ram Kumar Trivedi; (iii) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to fix and make payment of difference of arrears of post retiral dues payable to petitioner's father to Class III Category (post of Collection Amin) as father of petitioner was not placed in Category III nor his account was maintained in Class III as is evident from letter no. 432/ Sangrah/Se. Ni./ Ram Kumar Trivedi/San. Amin/2021-2022 dated 13th September, 2021 sent to Additional District Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Shankar, Mahendra Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pankaj Kumar Trivedi @ Pankaj Trivedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Magistrate (Collection) Sitapur contained in annexure no.3 to the writ petition. 3. It has been submitted that earlier petitioner had filed Writ-A No.1964 of 2024 seeking payment of post retiral benefits including pension due to his father. The said petition has been disposed of vide order dated 30.04.2024 directing the authority concerned to take a decision thereupon, whereafter the said payment was made with delay only upon filing of contempt petition but interest thereupon has yet not been paid. 4.
Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to move a fresh representation before party no.2 i.e. District Magistrate,Sitapur which shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the said authority. 5. The petition stands disposed of. September 10, 2025 Shahnaz WRIA No. 10528 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench