Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163139 (ALL)

RAMVATI v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER, AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER

A227/5352/2025 · 2025-09-09

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5352 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction for expeditious disposal of Revision Case No. 2296/2022 Computerized Case No. C202204000002296 (Ramavati Vs. Rajmati) filed U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case, State-respondent considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya is directed to consider and decide Revision Case No. 2296/2022 Computerized Case No. C202204000002296 (Ramavati Vs. Rajmati) filed U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ratnesh Singh, Pranav Mishra, Rahul Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramvati .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5352 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench