HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8463 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Shakti Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. 2. This petition has been filed mainly seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the opposite party nos. 1 to 4 to take appropriate action and make impartial enquiry against the opposite party no. 5 upon the applications given by the petitioner and further to decide the representation moved by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued for disposal of the representation of the petitioner in regard to the misbehaviour of respondent no. 5. 4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of written instructions of Mr. Pankaj Tiwari, S.H.O., P.S. Naimisharanya, District Sitapur, submits that in regard to his grievance, the petitioner had made a representation for lodging of F.I.R. against respondent no. 5 and taking action against him and on the said complaint, action has been taken against respondent no. 5 and after inquiry, 'Warning' has been issued to respondent no. 5 by means of the order dated 1st September, 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner has also filed a criminal case in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitapur against respondent no. 5, which was registered as Crl. Misc. Case No. 708 of 2025 under Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shakti Kumar Sharma, Deepali Yadav, Neha Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Anoop Kumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Section 210 B.N.S.S. After hearing, vide order dated 26.08.2025, the court concerned directed to register the said case as complaint case and also ordered for examination of complainant under Section 223 B.N.S.S. Thus, the submission is that the prayer made in the petition is misconceived as the action has already been taken by respondent no. 4 and the petitioner has already availed the remedy of filing complaint case. The aforesaid written instructions are taken on record. 5. In view of above, no further action is required in the matter. 6. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. September 19, 2025 VKS CRLP No. 8463 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench