Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163098 (ALL)

VIPIN SINGH @ SHIV PRATAP SINGH @ LALJI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO.

BAIL/8499/2025 · 2025-09-08

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8499 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Avinash Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.10 of 2022 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 of I.P.C. registered at Police Station- Dileeppur, District- Pratapgarh. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 14.08.2022 against seven persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant's father died on 02.07.2020. Two years after his death, a sale deed was executed in favour of a co-accused Shebu by setting up some imposter, on 15.07.2022. 4. The applicant has been implicated as he has witnessed the execution of the sale deed. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a 62 years old innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 6. The applicant's involvement in another criminal case has been disclosed in para-28 of the affidavit, in which he has been granted bail by the trial Court. 7. Co-accused- Shebu, who is the beneficiary of the sale deed, has already been granted bail by means of an order dated 27.09.2023 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Avinash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. Vipin Singh @ Shiv Pratap Singh @ Lalji .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) passed by this Court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.11720 of 2023. 8. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 9. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 11. Let the applicant- Vipin Singh @ Shiv Pratap Singh @ Lalji be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. September 8, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8499 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench