Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163080 (ALL)

RAJARAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPTT. LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WPIL/942/2025 · 2025-09-09

Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 942 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for State Election Commission. Panchayat elections have not been notified as yet. The petitioners apprehend irregularities by opposite party no.7, who has been appointed as Booth Level Officer, for the said elections which are yet to be notified. We cannot entertain the writ petition merely on apprehension. In future, if there is cause, the petitioners may approach the District Election Officer concerned. The writ petition is disposed of. September 9, 2025 akhilesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, Dileep Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Rajaram And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench