1 APHC010215732019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9512/2019 Between: Ch. Sudheer Kumar ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. I MADHU BABU (SC FOR JNTU KAKINADA) 2. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI 3. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9512/2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent for not complying and implementing the UO Note.1/Ch.S.K./Duty 2019 Dated 25.05.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent in so far as it relates to continuing and allowing the petitioner as Assistant Professor Department of PE and PCE, College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada, EG District is concerned as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, malafide, violating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential directions directing the 4th respondent to implement the instructions of 3rd respondent by UO Note.1/Ch.S.K./Duty 2019 Dated 25.05.2019 in continuing the services of the petitioner as Assistant Professor Department of PE and PCE, College of Engineering, JNTUK, Kakinada, EG District and further direct the 3rd respondent to pay the salary for the month of May and June 2019 to the petitioner duly recovering the same from the 4th respondent is concerned and to pass…” 2. Heard Ms.S.V.Indira, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri I.Madhu Babu, learned Standing Counsel for JNTU for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education on behalf of the respondent No.1. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is continuing in the service and no further orders are required in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 3 Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 11.03.2025 UPS 4 26 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.9512 of 2019 Dated.11.03.2025 UPS