HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10366 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State as well as Ms Manjari holding brief of Shri Gaurav Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 & 3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Contention of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.03.2023, the respondents have failed to make payment of salary for the period of suspension, amount of leave encashment, security amount and insurance etc., alongwith admissible interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.2 then the respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Pandey, Kumar Rahul Tripathi, Sabhajeet Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gaurav Mehrotra Surendra Nath Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Cooperative Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. September 9, 2025 prateek WRIA No. 10366 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench