HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 108 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant. 2. Review petition has been filed challenging judgment order dated 11.08.2025 whereby writ petition filed by petitioner was dismissed. 3. It is evident that grounds taken in this review application do not indicate any error apparent on the face of records. In fact the grounds taken indicate factual aspects which cannot be considered in review petition since all the aspects and agitated in writ petition cannot be reopened in review jurisdiction. 4. In view thereof, this Court does not in fact the grounds taken by the review applicant may be considered in appellate jurisdiction but not under review jurisdiction. 5. In view thereof, the review petition does not having disclosed any error apparent on the face of record, is dismissed at the admission stage itself. parties to bear their own cost. September 8, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Ankit Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Mathur,J.) Maya Shukla @ Maya Mishra .....Applicant(s) Secy./Examination Controller Lower Subordinate Service Selection Commission Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench