SHRIRAM FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/4163/2025 · 2025-04-30
Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16307 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16307 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:69142-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4163 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shriram Finance Company Limited Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ekansh Varma,Vishnu Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is directed to implead Mr. Mehtab Ahmad as respondent No.5 to the writ petition during the course of the day.
2. Heard Sri Ekansh Varma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Nimai Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
3. In the present writ petition, the following prayers have been made by the petitioner:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impunged order dated-18-04-2024 passed by the Assistant Regional Transport Officer (Admn.) Prayagraj. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Regional Transport Officer, District Allahabad to remove the black listing of the vehicle bearing registration no.U.P.70 DT
9373. (iii) Issue a writ order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
4. Sri Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, submits that the finance company which is the petitioner herein, has granted a finance to the respondent no.4 who is the second owner of the vehicle. He submits that there
seems to be fraudulent transactions between one Mr. Mehtab Ahmad (newly impleaded respondent No.5) and the respondent no.4.
5. In light of the same, learned Standing Counsel has fairly submits that opportunity of hearing should be granted to the parties before taking any final decision in the matter.
6. Accordingly, Assistant Regional Transport Officer, Allahabad is
directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, respondent no.4 and Mr. Mehtab Ahamad/respondent No.5, and thereafter, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law.
7. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 1.5.2025 Dev (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad