Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163069 (ALL)

M/S SILKON HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. THRU DIRECTOR VINAY KUMAR RAI v. U.P. SWASTHYA BIMA KALYAN SAMITI LKO THRU SECY.

ARBT/70/2023 · 2025-08-29

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL MISC. ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. - 70 of 2023 with CIVIL MISC. ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. - 85 of 2023 with CIVIL MISC. ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. - 86 of 2023 Court No. - 7 Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sant Prasad Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Nishant Shukla, Madhukar Ojha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sant Prasad Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Nishant Shukla, Madhukar Ojha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sant Prasad Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Nishant Shukla, Madhukar Ojha M/S Silkon Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Thru Director Vinay Kumar Rai .....Applicant(s) U.P. Swasthya Bima Kalyan Samiti Lko Thru Secy. .....Opposite Party(s) M/S Gunjan Enterprises (Agency), Through Its Proprietor, Shri Diwakar Singh .....Applicant(s) Uttar Pradesh Swasthya Bima Kalyan Samiti Through Its Secretary .....Opposite Party(s) M/S Brain Power Hr Management Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Director Shree Ravindra Singh .....Applicant(s) Uttar Pradesh Swasthya Bima Kalyan Samiti Through Its Secretary .....Opposite Party(s) HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. None appeared for either party in all the three connected matters. 2. The Arbitration Applications are of the year 2023; hence, this Court is not inclined to grant further adjournment in the absence of counsel for the respective parties. 3. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. Consigned to record. August 29, 2025 Shubhankar ARBT No. 70 of 2023 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench