Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163067 (MAD)

S.Sivasanmuganathan v. The State of Tamil Nadu

CRL OP(MD)/20207/2024 · 2025-04-21

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20207 of 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.04.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20207 of 2024 S.Sivasanmuganathan .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District 2. The Inspector of Police Aaviyur Police Station Virudhunagar District 3.Vellaiyammal 4.Muthukumaran 5. Saravanan .. Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the first respondent to direct the second respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's life and limb at the hands of the respondents 3 to 5 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 09.11.2024 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Vishnu 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20207 of 2024 For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar No.1 and 2 Government Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the first respondent to direct the second respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's life and limb at the hands of the respondents 3 to 5 on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 09.11.2024 within the time stipulated by this Court. 2. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the representation of the petitioner was already considered and the same was closed after enquiry . Therefore nothing survives for further adjudication. 3. Since the prayer of the petitioner is only to consider the representation dated 09.11.2024 and the same was considered and closed by the second respondent nothing survives for further adjudication. However if any criminal activities done by the private respondents it is for the petitioner to approach the second respondent and if any such complaint is lodged by any of the parties, the second respondent is directed to take appropriate action in accordance with law. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20207 of 2024 4. With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 21.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No aav To 1. The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District 2. The Inspector of Police Aaviyur Police Station Virudhunagar District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20207 of 2024 P.DHANABAL,J. aav Crl.O.P.(MD)No.20207 of 2024 21.04.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis