Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16306 (JHR)

BIMAL YADAV ALIAS GANESH YADAV ALIAS VIMAL YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4782/2025 · 2025-09-15

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. (2025:JHHC:28177) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4782 of 2025 Bimal Yadav @ Ganesh Yadav @ Vimal Yadav, aged about 52 years, S/o late Musafir Yadav, R/o At- Jamuniya, P.O.- Dakshani Umga, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad, Bihar … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. --- 03/15.09.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No. 25 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. No.448 of 2018, S.T. No.54 of 2021, for the offences registered under Sections 147 /148 /149 /307/353/504/506 of the I.P.C. and Sections 25(1-A)/26/27/35 of the Arms Act, Section 17 of CLA Act and Sections 10/13/16/20/23 of the UAP Act, but charge has been submitted under Sections 147/148/149/307/353/504/506 of the I.P.C. and Sections 25(1- A)/26/27/35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 of the C.L.A. Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Palamau. On 26.02.2018 at about 8:30 A.M., Chhattarpur police on the basis of confidential information that extremists had assembled at village- Baghmanwa went to the place of occurrence. On seeing the police party, the accused persons started firing. There was encounter between the both the sides. On being over powered, the miscreants fled away. It was submitted that no police personnel was injured in the said occurrence. It was further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 07.05.2018. It was also submitted that name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of the fact that the accused persons were calling each other by their names. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Palamau, in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No. 25 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. No.448 of 2018, S.T. No.54 of 2021. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Jay/-