AMAR NATH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTT. MAGISTRATE DISTT. SULTANPUR AND 3 OTHERS
WPIL/932/2025 · 2025-09-08
Pankaj Bhatia
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163051 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 932 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following relief:
"(i) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party No.2 and 3 to remove the encroachment from the land lying in Gata No.669 measuring area 0.0050 hectare, Gata No.927 measuring area 0.0660 hectare and Gata No.934 measuring area 0.1230 hectare situated at Village Hayatpur, Pargana- Barausa, Tehsil- Jaisinghpur, District- Sultanpur within stipulated time."
3. Learned Standing Counsel, based upon the instructions, states that the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have already been initiated.
4. In view of the said statement, the present petition is disposed of with direction to conclude the pending proceedings expeditiously within the time prescribed under the statute, i.e., 90 days. September 8, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Amar Nath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Distt. Sultanpur And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench