Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163040 (ALL)

KABUTARA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIC/8797/2025 · 2025-09-11

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8797 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that the private opposite parties are obstructing in the construction proposed to be raised. 3. Without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, as the petitioner has moved an application under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, the said application shall be decided by respondent No.2 in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim of the petitioner. 5. The petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambrish Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Kabutara .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench