1 2025:CGHC:16116 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2297 of 2025 1 - Rameshwari Kurre W/o Mahendra Prasad Kurre Aged About 42 Years Occupation-Peon-Ivth Class/daily Paid Employye, Govt. Pre.Matric Scheduled Caste Girls Hostel Salni, Block- Jaijaipur, R/o Salni, District Sakti C.G. 2 - Tikesh Kumar S/o Shri Narayan Prasad Lahre Aged About 25 Years Occupation-Peon-Ivth Class/daily Paid Employee, Govt. Aashramshala- Nagaridih, Block- Jaijaipur, R/o Nagaridih, District Sakti C.G. 3 - Dinesh Kumar S/o Shri Jitram Aged About 32 Years Occupation- Peon-Ivth Class/daily Paid Employee, Govt. Scheduled Caste Boys Aashram Nagaridih, Block- Jaijaipur, R/o Nagaridih, District Sakti C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur C.G. 2 - Aayukt Aadim Jati Tatha Anusuchit Jati Vikas Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Sahayak Aayukt, Aadiwasi Vikas Sakti, District- Sakti C.G. AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.04.09 16:23:58 +0530 2 4 - Collector, District- Sakti C.G. 5 - Adhikshak Govt. Anusuchit Jati Balak Aashram Nagaridih, Block- Jaiajipur, District- Sakti C.G. 6 - Adhikshak Govt. Pre. Matric Scheduled Caste Girls Hostel Salni, Block- Jaijaipur, District- Sakti C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 07/04/2025 1. The limited grievance that the petitioners have in the instant case is the action on the part of the respondents in discontinuing the services of petitioner. 2. According to the counsel for petitioners, they working as daily wage employee under the respondents and suddenly, the services of the petitioners were discontinued. 3. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, counsel for the petitioners submit that he has instruction to state that there is availability of work in the department and they are also in need of daily wage employees, however, ignoring the claim of petitioners for said work they are appointing third persons against the said post. 4. The only prayer that the petitioners make at this juncture is 3 that, if at all, if the respondents intend to engage daily wage workers, let the petitioners be given some preferential right and to be continued instead of appointing fresh personnel. The respondents be directed to take work from the petitioners considering their experience and the length of service rendered by them. 5. Looking to the said grievance that the petitioners have, the writ petition at this juncture is disposed of directing the respondents to look into the grievance of petitioners and try to redress the same as far as possible by reengaging the petitioners, if at all if the State or the respondents intend to get work from the daily wage workers. Under such circumstances, the petitioners be given due weightage for the services that they had already rendered in the past. 6. With aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep