Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163035 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. LABOUR DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/8757/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8757 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The award in favour of the petitioner was rendered by the Employees Compensation Commissioner on 18.06.2024 (Annexure no.1) which according to him has attained finality. Pursuant to the award, a recovery certificate has also came to be issued on 12.08.2024 (Annexure no.3). The Additional District Magistrate (Land and Revenue) Pratapgarh has failed to execute the recovery certificate and realize the amount due till date from respondent No.4. 3. Accordingly, the Additional District Magistrate (Land and Revenue) Pratapgarh is hereby directed to realize the amount payable to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order and remit the same to the Employees Compensation Commissioner, if there is no legal impediment, so that the same is released in favour of the petitioner at the earliest. 4. This exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed off. September 9, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sharad Nandan Ojha, Akhand Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amarjeet Singh Rakhra (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Labour Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench