HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1185 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to quash the charge-sheet dated 28.03.2025 filed in FIR No.034/2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 117(2) B.N.S. lodged at Police Station Bangarmau, District Unnao, to quash the cognizance/summoning order dated 06.05.2025 and to quash the entire proceedings of Case No.942/2025, arising out of the aforesaid case crime number. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and were never involved in committing the offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. He added that due to enmity, their names have been planted in the first information report and thereafter they have been charge-sheeted. He next added that due to unavoidable circumstances, they could not appear before the trial below. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Kumar Pandey, Akhil Kumar Singh, Mirza Ataulla Beg Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saleem @ Puttan @ Kadir Hanif Khan And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. Further, the applicants will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the pleas factual and legal which may be available to them, in accordance with law. In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial Court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law. 8. The application is disposed of accordingly. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) September 9, 2025 MVS/- NA528 No. 1185 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench