Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163029 (ALL)

SUNIL KUMAR TRIVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8467/2025 · 2025-09-11

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8467 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Ayush Tandon, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 4 is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Sachin Yadav holding brief of Shri Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for respondent no. 4. 3. This petition has been filed seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the F.I.R. No. 187 of 2025 dated 09.06.2025, under Sections 127(2), 74, 352, 132 B.N.S., P.S. Haidergarh, District Barabanki. A further writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3 not to arrest the petitioner on the basis of impugned F.I.R., has been sought. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have entered into a compromise for quashing of the impugned F.I.R., the original copy of which, is annexed as Annexure 2 to the petition. It is, thus, submitted that the impugned F.I.R. may be quashed. 5. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 4 also does not dispute the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that the impugned F.I.R. may be quashed. 6. However, learned A.G.A., on the basis of written instruction of Mr. Kapil Dev Yadav, Sub-Inspector, P.S. Haidergarh, District Barabanki Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajai Kumar, Nazar Husain Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Sunil Kumar Trivedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) dated 03.09.2025, submits that the investigation has been concluded and charge sheet has been prepared and forwarded to the Supervisory Authority, who after examining the same, shall take further action in the matter. The aforesaid written instruction is taken on record. 7. In view of above, without entering into the merit of the case, the petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file the compromise before the Supervisory Authority, Haidergarh, District Barabanki, who shall consider the same and send back the matter to the Investigating Officer, who in turn, shall consider the same and file appropriate report. 8. Office is directed return the original compromise to the learned counsel for the petitioner forthwith, after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. September 11, 2025 VKS CRLP No. 8467 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench