Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163025 (ALL)

MUHAMMAD SAZID v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/995/2025 · 2025-09-10

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 995 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohd. Salman, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Angad Kumar Vishwakarma, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.0128 of 2024, under Sections 420, 406, 411, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station- Hathigawan, District- Pratapgarh. 3. After advancing submission at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the instant application and seeks liberty to file an application for bail. 4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case, such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 10, 2025 Preeti. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Salman, Ana Fatma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Muhammad Sazid .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench