RANVIR SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF FINANCE U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/10312/2025 · 2025-09-09
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163006 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163006 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10312 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Commutation of Pension
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner(s) and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging provision to the extent stating restoration period of 15 years in the U.P. Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules 1941 as amended by Government Orders and seeking restoration of the commuted pension after expiry of 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in relevant Government Orders dated 23.07.1987, 06.12.1990 and 08.12.2008.
3. Learned counsel for the parties admit that the case of the petitioner(s) is squarely covered by judgment of this Court in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 ( Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others) and other connected matters decided on 28.05.2025.
4. Considering aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of finally providing that petitioner(s) of this writ petition shall also be entitled to benefit of judgment rendered in WRIT - A No. - 5617 of 2024 (Dr. Om Prakash Srivastava And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance Lko 3 Others). September 9, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jayveer Rajput, Akhil Anand Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ranvir Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Finance U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench