HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5299 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 3 - Tahsildar, Tahsil- Sandila, District Hardoi to dispose of the case, Case No. 6160/2025 Gaon Sabha Ghughera Versus Ishrat Husain and other Computer No. T202510330406160 under Section 67 of Revenue Act 2006 which is pending before Tahsildar Sandila, District Hardoi for removal of illegal encroachment of Gaon Sabha land by Ishrat Husain, as early as possible. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 3 - Tahsildar, Tahsil- Sandila, District Hardoi , considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Considering the fact that Case No. 6160/2025 Gaon Sabha Ghughera Versus Ishrat Husain and other Computer No. T202510330406160 under Section 67 of Revenue Act 2006, has been filed in 2025, this Court finds no ground for issuing direction to the authority concerned to expedite the proceedings of the said case. 6. However, it is provided that in case there is any extraordinary delay in final disposal of the aforesaid case, liberty is granted to the petitioner to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Prasad, Kuldeep Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Sewak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Panchayat Raj, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) approach this Court by filing fresh writ petition. 7. With above observation, the writ petition stands dismissed. September 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5299 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench