Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162984 (ALL)

BAHORI LAL v. SRI ANUNAY JHA, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, HARDOI DISTT. HARDOI

CAPL/2871/2025 · 2025-09-09

Manish Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2871 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred for the alleged non- compliance of the judgment and order dated 04.04.2025, passed by this court in Public Interest Litigation No. 278 of 2025. 2. The record of the paper book shows that a copy of the representation addressed to the opposite party, has been enclosed, without there being any postal receipt or receiving in the office of the opposite party, meaning thereby, that the applicant has not served the certified/photocopy of the judgment and order passed by the writ court upon the opposite party. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file a fresh contempt application, after service upon the opposite party. 4. Under these circumstances, the present contempt application is not maintainable, hence dismissed, but liberty is given to the applicant to file a fresh contempt application, after service of notice upon the opposite party. September 9, 2025 DiVYa Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Bahori Lal .....Applicant(s) Sri Anunay Jha, District Magistrate, Hardoi Distt. Hardoi .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench