Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162976 (ALL)

RAMRATAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

A482/7530/2025 · 2025-09-09

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7530 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to pass an order allowing the petition quashing the impugned summoning order dated 15.10.2024 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate First, Sitapur by means of which the learned court concern has taken cognizance and summoned to the petitioner and Charge Sheet No.286/2024 dated 07.09.2024 arising out from the Case No.988/2024, Case Crime No.316/2023, Under Section 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, Police Station Taalgaon, District Sitapur in "State Versus Ramratan" pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate First, Sitapur." 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramratan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 9, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7530 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench