Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 162954 (ALL)

DEEP CHAND PRASAD (PNO-850273037) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME AFFAIRS DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/10319/2025 · 2025-09-09

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10319 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for payment of difference of arrears of salary of Rs.1800/- per month and for payment arrears of pension along with interest as has been made admissible to similarly situated personnel in the department. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e.Superintendent of Police, District Raebareli. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. September 9, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rayees Ahmad Khan, Sateesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Deep Chand Prasad (Pno-850273037) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Affairs Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench