RAM SHANKAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1196/2025 · 2025-09-11
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162931 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 162931 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1196 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Ramakar Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Angad Kumar Vishwakarma, learned AGA for the State.
2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press this bail application as the applicants want to appear before the trial court and seek their release on bail.
3. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicants to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 11, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ram Shankar Tiwari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench