Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16293 (AP)

V. Mallikarjuna Rao, v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/26489/2003 · 2025-01-29

Challa Gunaranjan, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (RNT,J & CGR,J W.P.NO.26489 OF 2003 ) APHC010214282003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3509] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 26489/2003 Between: V. Mallikarjuna Rao, ...PETITIONER AND The Government Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M RATNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari ) The dispute pertains to the seniority. The 4th respondent-Sub-Registrar has filed O.A., along with some other persons, in which, the order on the point of seniority was decided in his favour. The present petitioner was the 6th respondent in the said O.A., 2 (RNT,J & CGR,J W.P.NO.26489 OF 2003 ) 2. On 09.12.2024, the following order was passed: “It is informed that learned counsel for the petitioner is no more. 2. Issue notice to the petitioner to engage another counsel. 3. Post after four (04) weeks.” 3. On 06.01.2025, the following order was passed: “Await service of notice on the petitioner, which was issued due to death of petitioner’s counsel. 2. Post after three (03) weeks in the weekly cause-list.” 4. As per the office note, the notice was returned as unserved with an endorsement “no such person in the address, hence returned”. 5. The notice was sent to the address mentioned in the writ petition. 6. Even otherwise the petitioner is expected to follow the proceedings of the writ petition once he had filed the same and has to be vigilant. 7. There is no representation. 8. The matter pertains to the year 2003. 9. The Writ Petition is dismissed “for want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _______________________ CHALLA GUNARANJAN,J Date : 29.01.2025. RPD. 3 (RNT,J & CGR,J W.P.NO.26489 OF 2003 ) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION) WRIT PETITION NO: 26489 OF 2003 Date: 29.01.2025 RPD